Trawick v. State

696 So. 2d 398, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6265, 1997 WL 311739
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 11, 1997
DocketNo. 95-3630
StatusPublished

This text of 696 So. 2d 398 (Trawick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trawick v. State, 696 So. 2d 398, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6265, 1997 WL 311739 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gary Trawick’s court-appointed counsel, Louis M. Jepeway, Jr., appeals, and the State of Florida cross-appeals from an award of attorney’s fees for services rendered in a capital appeal. We reverse.

In Birnholz v. Steisel, 394 So.2d 523 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), this Court adopted, “the universally accepted doctrine as to attorney’s fees ... that the statute of limitations accrues when the particular services are completed.” Birnholz, 394 So.2d at 524. In the instant case, a review of the record indicates that the statute of limitations accrued in 1985 when Mr. Jepeway’s services with regard to the direct appeal were completed and that he did not file a motion for reasonable attorney’s fees with the lower court until 1995, well after the applicable statute of limitations had expired.

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Birnholz v. Steisel
394 So. 2d 523 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
696 So. 2d 398, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6265, 1997 WL 311739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trawick-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.