Trawick v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Trawick v. State

115 So. 79, 22 Ala. App. 280

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 29, 1927

Docket4 Div. 346.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 115 So. 79 (Trawick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trawick v. State, 115 So. 79, 22 Ala. App. 280 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was convicted on a charge of possessing prohibited liquors, and he appeals.

The evidence in this record has been examined, and we find sufficient facts to authorize a jury in finding the defendant guilty as charged. We further 'are of the opinion that there is no reversible error in any of. the rulings of the court. The judgment of guilt is affirmed.

The sentence as to costs is indefinite, ■ and for that reason the cause is remanded for proper sentence in conformity with section 5291, Code 1923; Collins v. State, 21 Ala. App. 594, 110 So. 479.

Affirmed and remanded for proper sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI