Travis v. State

557 So. 2d 239, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1227, 1990 WL 18450
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 2, 1990
DocketNo. 87-01761
StatusPublished

This text of 557 So. 2d 239 (Travis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Travis v. State, 557 So. 2d 239, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1227, 1990 WL 18450 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Counsel for appellant has been permitted to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). After independent examination of the record the state concurs that no meritorious grounds exist to support this appeal, and appellant has submitted no pro se pleadings. We affirm the judgment of guilt and order of probation entered in this ease, but strike the imposition of court costs without prejudice to the state to seek reassessment after proper notice and hearing. Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (Fla.1989).

SCHEB, A.C.J., and LEHAN and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Wood v. State
544 So. 2d 1004 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
557 So. 2d 239, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1227, 1990 WL 18450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/travis-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.