Travis v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Travis v. State

730 S.W.2d 501, 292 Ark. 463, 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2153

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJune 15, 1987

DocketCR 86-204

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 730 S.W.2d 501 (Travis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Travis v. State, 730 S.W.2d 501, 292 Ark. 463, 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2153 (Ark. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Tom Glaze, Justice.

While serving a life sentence for a homicide in the Arkansas Department of Correction, appellant killed a fellow inmate and was charged with capital murder in August 1981. Twelve months later, he pled guilty to a reduced charge of first degree murder and was sentenced to a twenty-year term to run consecutively to his existing life sentence. In September 1986, appellant brought this action, requesting the trial court to amend his commitment order to reflect the penitentiary time he was already serving on the prior homicide but which caused him, also, to be incarcerated for the twelve-month period between his arrest and his eventual conviction for this second homicide. The trial court treated appellant’s letter-request as a petition for mandamus and denied it. We affirm.

Appellant’s argument, while unique, is wholly without merit. He simply was not entitled to credit for his time in jail or the pentitentiary because the time he was serving was on an unrelated charge. See McGirt v. State, 289 Ark. 7, 708 S.W.2d 620 (1986). He cites Ark. Stat. Ann. § 41-904 (Repl. 1977), which deals with credit for time spent in custody, but that law clearly does not apply when, as here, the defendant’s incarceration exists because of charges or criminal conduct other than the one on which the defendant seeks credit and for which he is convicted and sentenced.

The trial court correctly denied appellant’s petition, and we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tom Glaze, Justice.

While serving a life sentence for a homicide in the Arkansas Department of Correction, appellant killed a fellow inmate and was charged with capital murder in August 1981. Twelve months later, he pled guilty to a reduced charge of first degree murder and was sentenced to a twenty-year term to run consecutively to his existing life sentence. In September 1986, appellant brought this action, requesting the trial court to amend his commitment order to reflect the penitentiary time he was already serving on the prior homicide but which caused him, also, to be incarcerated for the twelve-month period between his arrest and his eventual conviction for this second homicide. The trial court treated appellant’s letter-request as a petition for mandamus and denied it. We affirm.

Appellant’s argument, while unique, is wholly without merit. He simply was not entitled to credit for his time in jail or the pentitentiary because the time he was serving was on an unrelated charge. See McGirt v. State, 289 Ark. 7, 708 S.W.2d 620 (1986). He cites Ark. Stat. Ann. § 41-904 (Repl. 1977), which deals with credit for time spent in custody, but that law clearly does not apply when, as here, the defendant’s incarceration exists because of charges or criminal conduct other than the one on which the defendant seeks credit and for which he is convicted and sentenced.

The trial court correctly denied appellant’s petition, and we affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

730 S.W.2d 501, 292 Ark. 463, 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/travis-v-state-ark-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack