Travis v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Travis v. State

58 So. 270, 176 Ala. 25, 1912 Ala. LEXIS 70

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided April 11, 1912·Published

Opinion

DOWDELL, C. J.

The appeal in this case is taken on the record without a bill of exceptions. The only question raised on the record is the action of the court in overruling the defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment. The grounds of the motion are not set out. As the record appears in all respects regular, the motion, if based on error apparent of record, was properly overruled. Moreover, the motion was not made until after judgment had been entered on the verdict. The motion, therefore, in arrest of judgment came too late. — Sanders v. State, 129 Ala. 69, 29 South. 841.

A careful consideration of the record by us fails to disclose any reversible error, and the judgment appealed from must therefore be affirmed.

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOWDELL, C. J.

The appeal in this case is taken on the record without a bill of exceptions. The only question raised on the record is the action of the court in overruling the defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment. The grounds of the motion are not set out. As the record appears in all respects regular, the motion, if based on error apparent of record, was properly overruled. Moreover, the motion was not made until after judgment had been entered on the verdict. The motion, therefore, in arrest of judgment came too late. — Sanders v. State, 129 Ala. 69, 29 South. 841.

A careful consideration of the record by us fails to disclose any reversible error, and the judgment appealed from must therefore be affirmed.

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Travis v. State, 58 So. 270, 176 Ala. 25, 1912 Ala. LEXIS 70 (Ala. 1912).

Pincite

58 So. 270 (Travis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related