Travis v. State

58 So. 270, 176 Ala. 25, 1912 Ala. LEXIS 70
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedApril 11, 1912
StatusPublished

This text of 58 So. 270 (Travis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Travis v. State, 58 So. 270, 176 Ala. 25, 1912 Ala. LEXIS 70 (Ala. 1912).

Opinion

DOWDELL, C. J.

The appeal in this case is taken on the record without a bill of exceptions. The only question raised on the record is the action of the court in overruling the defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment. The grounds of the motion are not set out. As the record appears in all respects regular, the motion, if based on error apparent of record, was properly overruled. Moreover, the motion was not made until after judgment had been entered on the verdict. The motion, therefore, in arrest of judgment came too late. — Sanders v. State, 129 Ala. 69, 29 South. 841.

A careful consideration of the record by us fails to disclose any reversible error, and the judgment appealed from must therefore be affirmed.

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sanders v. State
129 Ala. 69 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 So. 270, 176 Ala. 25, 1912 Ala. LEXIS 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/travis-v-state-ala-1912.