Travis v. Mitchell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Travis v. Mitchell

181 A.D. 889

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1917

StatusPublished

This text of 181 A.D. 889 (Travis v. Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Travis v. Mitchell, 181 A.D. 889 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed as to the defendant Hendricks, [890]*890without costs, upon the ground that no conversion by her was proven. As to the defendant Mitchell, judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the evidence does not clearly or convincingly establish that the alleged gift by the decedent to said defendant of the stock certificate, on July 9, 1913, was absolute and not merely to take effect at the death of the donor, and that the weight of thé evidence indicates that it was of the latter character. Stapleton, Mills, Rich, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed as to the defendant Hendricks, [890]*890without costs, upon the ground that no conversion by her was proven. As to the defendant Mitchell, judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the evidence does not clearly or convincingly establish that the alleged gift by the decedent to said defendant of the stock certificate, on July 9, 1913, was absolute and not merely to take effect at the death of the donor, and that the weight of thé evidence indicates that it was of the latter character. Stapleton, Mills, Rich, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 A.D. 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/travis-v-mitchell-nyappdiv-1917.