Travis v. Bishop

54 Mass. 304
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1847
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 54 Mass. 304 (Travis v. Bishop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Travis v. Bishop, 54 Mass. 304 (Mass. 1847).

Opinion

Shaw, C. J.

There having been no delivery of the horse, and no registration of the mortgage, the plaintiff has not established his title to the property, so as to maintain this action against the defendant, who claims under a sale and delivery, and is not a party to the mortgage. The provision in the Rev. Sts. c. 74, § 5, conforms, in terms, to St. 1832, c. 157, § 1, under which the court decided the case of Bullock v, Williams, 16 Pick. 33. That case proceeded on the ground that, by force of the statute, registration was sufficient to give effect to a mortgage of personal property capable of being identified by a written description. But it seems to be distinctly implied, from the case, that without either possession or registration, the mortgage could not be valid, either by common law or by statute. A new trial will be ordered, unless the plaintiff elects to become nonsuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Montana Meat Co. v. Missoula Livestock Auction Co.
230 P.2d 955 (Montana Supreme Court, 1951)
New Bedford Motor Car Co. v. Macintosh
6 Conn. Supp. 80 (Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, 1939)
New Bedford Motor Car Co., Inc. v. MacIntosh
6 Conn. Super. Ct. 80 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 Mass. 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/travis-v-bishop-mass-1847.