Travis v. Air Control Products, Inc.
This text of 209 So. 2d 449 (Travis v. Air Control Products, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 19, 1967.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition and cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.
The attorney for the claimant, Nelda Travis, is hereby awarded a fee in the amount of $250.00 for services in this Court in connection with the Cross-petition.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
209 So. 2d 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/travis-v-air-control-products-inc-fla-1968.