Travis Reager v. C-Dive, LLC, et al.

E.D. Louisiana

Travis Reager v. C-Dive, LLC, et al.

DecidedMarch 27, 2026

Docket2:24-cv-01979

StatusUnknown

This text of Travis Reager v. C-Dive, LLC, et al. (Travis Reager v. C-Dive, LLC, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Travis Reager v. C-Dive, LLC, et al., (E.D. La. 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

TRAVIS REAGER CIVIL ACTION

VERSUS NO. 24-1979

C-DIVE, LLC, ET AL SECTION “R” (3)

ORDER AND REASONS

Before the Court is the joint motion of plaintiffs and defendant to amend the scheduling order.1 Upon finding good cause, the Court grants the motion. Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that “[a] scheduling order may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). The “good cause standard requires the party seeking relief to show that the deadlines cannot reasonably be met despite the diligence of the party needing the extension.” S&W Enter., L.L.C. v. SouthTrust Bank of Ala., NA, 315 F.3d 533, 535 (5th Cir. 2003) (internal citations omitted). Whether to grant or deny a continuance is within the sound discretion of the trial court. United States v. Alix, 86 F.3d 429, 434 (5th Cir. 1996). In deciding whether to grant a continuance, the Court’s “judgment range is exceedingly wide, for . . . [it] must consider not only the

1 R. Doc. 53. facts of the particular case but also all of the demands on counsel’s time and the court’s.” Streber v. Hunter, 221 F.3d 701, 736 (5th Cir. 2000) (quoting HC Gun & Knife Shows, Inc. v. City of Houston, 201 F.3d 544, 549-50 (5th Cir. 2000) (internal quotation marks omitted)). The parties contend that a continuance is necessary because the plaintiff is still undergoing medical treatment for injuries related to his complaint.2, The Court finds that the parties have shown good cause to continue the trial and unexpired associated deadlines. Accordingly, the Court continues the trial and associated unexpired deadlines to be reset at a scheduling conference held BY TELEPHONE on APRIL 28, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. The parties shall call in for the teleconference using phone number (833) 990-9400, Access Code: 124518418. The Court will be represented by its Case Manager at the scheduling conference. All deadlines that have already expired are not reset.

New Orleans, Louisiana, this 27th day of March, 2026.

herk Verte SARAH 8S. VANCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2 See R. Doc. 53-1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

TRAVIS REAGER CIVIL ACTION

VERSUS NO. 24-1979

C-DIVE, LLC, ET AL SECTION “R” (3)

ORDER AND REASONS

Before the Court is the joint motion of plaintiffs and defendant to amend the scheduling order.1 Upon finding good cause, the Court grants the motion. Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that “[a] scheduling order may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). The “good cause standard requires the party seeking relief to show that the deadlines cannot reasonably be met despite the diligence of the party needing the extension.” S&W Enter., L.L.C. v. SouthTrust Bank of Ala., NA, 315 F.3d 533, 535 (5th Cir. 2003) (internal citations omitted). Whether to grant or deny a continuance is within the sound discretion of the trial court. United States v. Alix, 86 F.3d 429, 434 (5th Cir. 1996). In deciding whether to grant a continuance, the Court’s “judgment range is exceedingly wide, for . . . [it] must consider not only the

1 R. Doc. 53. facts of the particular case but also all of the demands on counsel’s time and the court’s.” Streber v. Hunter, 221 F.3d 701, 736 (5th Cir. 2000) (quoting HC Gun & Knife Shows, Inc. v. City of Houston, 201 F.3d 544, 549-50 (5th Cir. 2000) (internal quotation marks omitted)). The parties contend that a continuance is necessary because the plaintiff is still undergoing medical treatment for injuries related to his complaint.2, The Court finds that the parties have shown good cause to continue the trial and unexpired associated deadlines. Accordingly, the Court continues the trial and associated unexpired deadlines to be reset at a scheduling conference held BY TELEPHONE on APRIL 28, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. The parties shall call in for the teleconference using phone number (833) 990-9400, Access Code: 124518418. The Court will be represented by its Case Manager at the scheduling conference. All deadlines that have already expired are not reset.

New Orleans, Louisiana, this 27th day of March, 2026.

herk Verte SARAH 8S. VANCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2 See R. Doc. 53-1.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Travis Reager v. C-Dive, LLC, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/travis-reager-v-c-dive-llc-et-al-laed-2026.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack