Travis O'Neal Bluntson v. State
This text of Travis O'Neal Bluntson v. State (Travis O'Neal Bluntson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: Travis O'Neal Bluntson v. The State of Texas
Appellate case number: 01-18-01100-CR
Trial court case number: 2012R-0022
Trial court: 155th District Court of Austin County
Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief concluding that this appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967). Appellant, acting pro se, has filed a motion requesting access to a copy of the appellate record for use in preparing a response to appointed counsel’s brief. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 315, 318–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). We grant the motion.
We order the trial court clerk, no later than 10 days from the date of this order, to provide a copy of the record, including the clerk’s record, the reporter’s record, and any supplemental records, to the appellant. The trial court clerk shall further certify to this Court, within 15 days of the date of this order, the date upon which delivery of the record to the appellant is made.
Appellant also has requested an extension of time to file his pro se response to counsel’s Anders brief. We grant the motion for an extension. Appellant’s response to his appointed counsel’s brief shall be filed no later than thirty days from the date of this order.
It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Julie Countiss Acting individually
Date: October 24, 2019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Travis O'Neal Bluntson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/travis-oneal-bluntson-v-state-texapp-2019.