Travis Leslie Norton v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 13, 2018
Docket04-18-00022-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Travis Leslie Norton v. State (Travis Leslie Norton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Travis Leslie Norton v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 13, 2018

No. 04-18-00022-CR

Travis Leslie NORTON, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016CR3975 Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s brief originally was due April 2, 2018 but was not filed. This court notified appellant’s counsel of the deficiency on April 5, 2018. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2). On April 16, 2018, appellant filed a response and request for an extension of time to file the brief. This court granted the motion and extended the time to file the brief until May 21, 2018. On May 22, 2018, a supplemental clerk’s record was filed containing a second motion for extension of time to file the brief. Although the motion was required to be filed in this court, this court considered the motion in the interest of justice and extended the time to file the brief until July 5, 2018. This court’s order advised appellant that no further extensions would be granted absent extenuating circumstances. Appellant’s brief was not filed by July 5, 2018. On July 9, 2018, appellant’s counsel contacted this court and stated he would file a motion for another extension setting forth extenuating circumstances, but appellant’s counsel has failed to do so.

Appellant’s counsel is ORDERED to respond to this court in writing within ten days of the date of this order. The response should state a reasonable explanation for failing to timely file the brief and demonstrate the steps being taken to remedy the deficiency. If appellant’s counsel fails to file an adequate response within ten days, this appeal will be abated to the trial court for an abandonment hearing, and the trial court will be asked to consider whether sanctions are appropriate. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2). _________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 13th day of July, 2018.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Travis Leslie Norton v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/travis-leslie-norton-v-state-texapp-2018.