Travis Bush v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Travis Bush v. State

188 So. 3d 909, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8732, 2016 WL 1573832

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 24, 2016

Docket5D14-4525

StatusPublished

This text of 188 So. 3d 909 (Travis Bush v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Travis Bush v. State, 188 So. 3d 909, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8732, 2016 WL 1573832 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Travis Bush appeals from the judgment and sentence imposed by the trial court after it found that he had violated his probation. Although thére was competent, substantial evidence to support the trial court’s decision, we are compelled to remand because, as the State properly concedes, the trial court failed to enter a written order specifying the probation conditions violated. See Bell v . State, 60 So.3d 558, 558 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011); Young v. State, 4 So.3d 1265, 1266 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009).

Accordingly, we affirm the conviction and sentence but remand for. .entry of a proper revocation order specifying which conditions Bush was found to have violated.

AFFIRMED; case REMANDED for entry of a proper adjudication order.

TORPY, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Travis Bush appeals from the judgment and sentence imposed by the trial court after it found that he had violated his probation. Although thére was competent, substantial evidence to support the trial court’s decision, we are compelled to remand because, as the State properly concedes, the trial court failed to enter a written order specifying the probation conditions violated. See Bell v . State, 60 So.3d 558, 558 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011); Young v. State, 4 So.3d 1265, 1266 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009).

Accordingly, we affirm the conviction and sentence but remand for. .entry of a proper revocation order specifying which conditions Bush was found to have violated.

AFFIRMED; case REMANDED for entry of a proper adjudication order.

TORPY, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 So. 3d 909, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8732, 2016 WL 1573832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/travis-bush-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack