Travious D. Mozie v. State

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 27, 2017
Docket5D17-882
StatusPublished

This text of Travious D. Mozie v. State (Travious D. Mozie v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Travious D. Mozie v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

TRAVIOUS D. MOZIE,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D17-882

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed December 1, 2017

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, James H. Earp, Judge.

Travious D. Mozie, Crawfordville, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

In consideration of Appellee's October 31, 2017 motion for rehearing or clarification

and Appellant's November 15, 2017 motion for rehearing, we deny Appellant's motion,

grant Appellee's requested relief, withdraw our prior opinion, and substitute this opinion

in its stead. Appellant appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure

3.850 motion for postconviction relief, arguing the trial court erred in summarily denying

all seven of his claims without granting him an opportunity to amend them. We find that

the record conclusively refutes claims 1, 2, 3, and 6 and affirm their summary denial.

Because we find that claims 4 and 5 are facially insufficient, we reverse and remand for

the trial court to afford Appellant an opportunity to amend the claims. See Spera v. State,

971 So. 2d 754, 761 (Fla. 2007). Accordingly, we further reverse the denial of claim 7,

which alleged cumulative error, and order the trial court to address the claim on remand.

AFFIRMED in Part; REVERSED and REMANDED in Part.

LAMBERT, WALLIS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spera v. State
971 So. 2d 754 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Travious D. Mozie v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/travious-d-mozie-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.