Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Travieso v. Travieso

Travieso v. Travieso

854 So. 2d 285, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 13983, 2003 WL 22136247
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 17, 2003
DocketNo. 4D03-300
StatusPublished

This text of 854 So. 2d 285 (Travieso v. Travieso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Travieso v. Travieso, 854 So. 2d 285, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 13983, 2003 WL 22136247 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979). With respect to appellant’s claim regarding the invalidity of his marriage, [286]*286our affirmance is without prejudice to this issue being raised in the trial court.

WARNER, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
854 So. 2d 285, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 13983, 2003 WL 22136247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/travieso-v-travieso-fladistctapp-2003.