Travia v. Lomenzo

382 U.S. 9
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 22, 1965·No. 191·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Fort as took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. [For concurring opinion of Mr. Justice Harlan, see No. 85, WMCA, Inc., et al. v. Lomenzo, Secretary of State of New York, et al., ante, p. 4.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Travia v. Lomenzo, 382 U.S. 9 (1965).

382 U.S. 9 (Travia v. Lomenzo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lomenzo v. WMCA, Inc.
384 U.S. 948 (Supreme Court, 1966)
Bush v. Martin
251 F. Supp. 484 (S.D. Texas, 1966)
In Re Apportionment of State Legislature
137 N.W.2d 495 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1965)