Traverso v. McMillin
137 A. 919, 101 N.J. Eq. 308, 16 Stock. 308, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 584
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 12.
*Page 309For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Traverso v. McMillin, 137 A. 919, 101 N.J. Eq. 308, 16 Stock. 308, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 584 (N.J. 1927).
137 A. 919 (Traverso v. McMillin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
First and American National Bank v. Higgins
293 N.W. 585 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1940)
In re the Estate of Heller
13 A.2d 303 (Warren County Surrogate's Court, 1940)
Cox v. Rusling
86 F.2d 236 (Third Circuit, 1936)
White v. Willever
165 A. 863 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1933)