Traverse v. Beall
24 F. Cas. 144, 2 D.C. 113, 2 Cranch 113
This text of 24 F. Cas. 144 (Traverse v. Beall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Traverse v. Beall, 24 F. Cas. 144, 2 D.C. 113, 2 Cranch 113 (circtddc 1815).
Opinion
(nem. con.) was of opinion that the award was bad, because it did not appear that the original arbitrators had differed before they called in the umpire, but that he decided upon the whole case ab initio.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
24 F. Cas. 144, 2 D.C. 113, 2 Cranch 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/traverse-v-beall-circtddc-1815.