Travers v. Ramsay
24 F. Cas. 143, 3 D.C. 354, 3 Cranch 354
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided December 15, 1828·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The CouRT (ThRuston, X, absent,) instructed the jury that if the possession remained with the grantor, the deed was void as to creditors ; and that if the title was in the father, the possession should be presumed to be in him also, at the time of the deed, unless the contrary should appear.
Verdict for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Travers v. Ramsay, 24 F. Cas. 143, 3 D.C. 354, 3 Cranch 354 (circtddc 1828).
24 F. Cas. 143 (Travers v. Ramsay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McKee v. Garcelon
60 Me. 165 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1872)