Travers v. Ramsay
24 F. Cas. 143, 3 D.C. 354, 3 Cranch 354
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedDecember 15, 1828
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 24 F. Cas. 143 (Travers v. Ramsay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Travers v. Ramsay, 24 F. Cas. 143, 3 D.C. 354, 3 Cranch 354 (circtddc 1828).
Opinion
The CouRT (ThRuston, X, absent,) instructed the jury that if the possession remained with the grantor, the deed was void as to creditors ; and that if the title was in the father, the possession should be presumed to be in him also, at the time of the deed, unless the contrary should appear.
Verdict for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McKee v. Garcelon
60 Me. 165 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1872)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
24 F. Cas. 143, 3 D.C. 354, 3 Cranch 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/travers-v-ramsay-circtddc-1828.