Travers v. Kulynych

139 A.D.3d 611, 30 N.Y.S.3d 823
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 26, 2016
Docket1288N 107720/11
StatusPublished

This text of 139 A.D.3d 611 (Travers v. Kulynych) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Travers v. Kulynych, 139 A.D.3d 611, 30 N.Y.S.3d 823 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered March 19, 2014, which denied defendant’s motion to vacate a default judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court providently exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to vacate the default judgment entered against him on plaintiff’s action for conversion, in light of his failure to show a meritorious defense to her well-documented claim (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Singh-Mehta v Drylewski, 107 AD3d 478 [1st Dept 2013]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Acosta, Saxe, Gische and Webber, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Singh-Mehta v. Drylewski
107 A.D.3d 478 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 A.D.3d 611, 30 N.Y.S.3d 823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/travers-v-kulynych-nyappdiv-2016.