Travellers Insurance Co. v. Murdock

208 N.C. 223
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 22, 1935
StatusPublished

This text of 208 N.C. 223 (Travellers Insurance Co. v. Murdock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Travellers Insurance Co. v. Murdock, 208 N.C. 223 (N.C. 1935).

Opinion

CoNNOR, J.

In Fertilizer Co. v. Godley, 204 N. C., 243, 167 S. E., 816, it is said:

“It is well settled in this jurisdiction that where a jury trial is waived, as in this case, and the trial judge finds the facts and judgment is entered thereon, if there was any competent, sufficient evidence to support the findings of fact, and the facts support the judgment, in such case, the findings of fact and the judgment thereon are conclusive.”

In the instant case there was no exception by the defendants to any finding of fact made by the judge. The findings of fact are therefore conclusive on defendants’ appeal to this Court. The contention of the [227]*227defendants on tbeir appeal to this Court that there was no evidence at the trial to support certain findings of fact made by the judge is not presented by a valid assignment of error, and for that reason cannot be considered.

The judgment is supported by the findings of fact made by the trial judge, and for that reason is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meadows Fertilizer Co. v. Godley
167 S.E. 816 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 N.C. 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/travellers-insurance-co-v-murdock-nc-1935.