Traveler's Prop. Cas. Co. of Am. v. Actavis

410 P.3d 1221, 229 Cal. Rptr. 3d 2
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Traveler's Prop. Cas. Co. of Am. v. Actavis. Read the opinion of the Court — 238 Cal. Rptr. 3d 527
California Supreme Court·Decided February 21, 2018·No. S245867·Published

Opinion

**1222The application for appear as counsel pro hac vice is granted. The petition for review is granted. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of related issues in Liberty Surplus Insurance Corp. v. Ledesma and Meyer Construction Co., S236765 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.512(d)(2) ), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further order of the court. Corrigan, J., was recused and did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Traveler's Prop. Cas. Co. of Am. v. Actavis, 410 P.3d 1221, 229 Cal. Rptr. 3d 2 (Cal. 2018).

410 P.3d 1221 (Traveler's Prop. Cas. Co. of Am. v. Actavis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.