Travelers Insurance v. Russo

155 Misc. 589, 280 N.Y.S. 99, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1199
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 10, 1935·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Any terms of an automobile liability policy which violate section 109 of the Insurance Law or limit the free force and effect thereof are illegal. Nevertheless the policy will be held valid and deemed to include the provisions required by that section. (Bakker v. Ætna Life Ins. Co., 264 N. Y. 150.) This rule controls the rights, duties and obligations of the insurer and the policyholder. We construe the present contract as attempting to limit the statutory provisions. It is, therefore, illegal and may not be enforced.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and judgment directed for defendant, with costs.

All concur; present, Hammer, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Travelers Insurance v. Russo, 155 Misc. 589, 280 N.Y.S. 99, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1199 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

155 Misc. 589 (Travelers Insurance v. Russo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Admiral Insurance v. Grace Industries, Inc.
409 B.R. 275 (E.D. New York, 2009)
Passaro v. Metropolitan Property & Liability Insurance
128 Misc. 2d 21 (New York Supreme Court, 1985)
Bersani v. GEN. ACC. FIRE CORP.
330 N.E.2d 68 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Bersani v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.
330 N.E.2d 68 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Bersani v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.
44 A.D.2d 212 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)
Posner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
33 Misc. 2d 653 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Standard Accident Insurance of Detroit v. Solomon
195 Misc. 48 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)
Eber Bros. Wine & Liquor v. Firemen's Ins.
30 F. Supp. 412 (S.D. New York, 1939)