Travelers Insurance v. Russo
This text of 155 Misc. 589 (Travelers Insurance v. Russo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Any terms of an automobile liability policy which violate section 109 of the Insurance Law or limit the free force and effect thereof are illegal. Nevertheless the policy will be held valid and deemed to include the provisions required by that section. (Bakker v. Ætna Life Ins. Co., 264 N. Y. 150.) This rule controls the rights, duties and obligations of the insurer and the policyholder. We construe the present contract as attempting to limit the statutory provisions. It is, therefore, illegal and may not be enforced.
Judgment reversed, with costs, and judgment directed for defendant, with costs.
All concur; present, Hammer, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
155 Misc. 589, 280 N.Y.S. 99, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/travelers-insurance-v-russo-nyappterm-1935.