Travelers Insurance v. Moxley

287 S.E.2d 340, 160 Ga. App. 391, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 3125
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 16, 1981·No. 62409; 62410·Published

Opinion

Pope, Judge.

The sole error enumerated in both these appeals is that the trial court erred in holding in contravention of Code Ann. § 114-302 that workers’ compensation benefits are subject to garnishment to enforce a decree for child support. This issue has recently been decided adversely to appellants in American Mut. Liab. Ins. Co. v. Hicks, 159 Ga. App. 214 (283 SE2d 18) (1981) (cert. den. September 30, 1981), where this court concluded “that a garnishment to a judgment for child support is not precluded by Code Ann. § 114-302.”

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Travelers Insurance v. Moxley, 287 S.E.2d 340, 160 Ga. App. 391, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 3125 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981).

287 S.E.2d 340 (Travelers Insurance v. Moxley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Mutual Liability Insurance v. Hicks
283 S.E.2d 18 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)