Travelers Insurance v. Moxley
This text of 287 S.E.2d 340 (Travelers Insurance v. Moxley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The sole error enumerated in both these appeals is that the trial court erred in holding in contravention of Code Ann. § 114-302 that workers’ compensation benefits are subject to garnishment to enforce a decree for child support. This issue has recently been decided adversely to appellants in American Mut. Liab. Ins. Co. v. Hicks, 159 Ga. App. 214 (283 SE2d 18) (1981) (cert. den. September 30, 1981), where this court concluded “that a garnishment to a judgment for child support is not precluded by Code Ann. § 114-302.”
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
287 S.E.2d 340, 160 Ga. App. 391, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 3125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/travelers-insurance-v-moxley-gactapp-1981.