Travelers Insurance v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Travelers Insurance v. Anderson

195 S.E. 879, 57 Ga. App. 496, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 319

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 12, 1938

Docket25589

StatusPublished

This text of 195 S.E. 879 (Travelers Insurance v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Travelers Insurance v. Anderson, 195 S.E. 879, 57 Ga. App. 496, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 319 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Stephens, P. J.

The Supreme Court having on certiorari (Travelers Ins. Co. v. Anderson, 185 Ga. 105, 194 S. E. 193) held that the award of compensation made by the Department of Industrial Relations was not legally authorized and that this court erred in affirming the judgment of the superior court affirming the award (54 Ga. App. 852, 189 S. E. 537), this court has vacated the judgment of affirmance heretofore rendered and now holds, under the authority of the Supreme Court, that the award was not legally authorized and that the judge of the superior court erred in affirming the award. The judgment of the superior court is

Reversed.

Sutton and Felton, JJ., concur. Neely, Marshall •& Greene, for plaintiff in error. Pat Ha/ralson, T. 8. Gaudier, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephens, P. J.

The Supreme Court having on certiorari (Travelers Ins. Co. v. Anderson, 185 Ga. 105, 194 S. E. 193) held that the award of compensation made by the Department of Industrial Relations was not legally authorized and that this court erred in affirming the judgment of the superior court affirming the award (54 Ga. App. 852, 189 S. E. 537), this court has vacated the judgment of affirmance heretofore rendered and now holds, under the authority of the Supreme Court, that the award was not legally authorized and that the judge of the superior court erred in affirming the award. The judgment of the superior court is

Reversed.

Sutton and Felton, JJ., concur. Neely, Marshall •& Greene, for plaintiff in error. Pat Ha/ralson, T. 8. Gaudier, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 S.E. 879, 57 Ga. App. 496, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/travelers-insurance-v-anderson-gactapp-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack