Travelers Insurance Company v. Rose
392 S.W.2d 462
Opinion
We refuse petitioner’s application for writ of error with the notation “no reversible error.” 389 S.W.2d 317.
The action taken, however, is not to be construed as approval of the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals that the lay witness Doyle Price was qualified to give opinion testimony to the effect that the respondent would not be able to hold a roughnecking job any more.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Travelers Insurance Company v. Rose, 392 S.W.2d 462 (Tex. 1965).
392 S.W.2d 462 (Travelers Insurance Company v. Rose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Travelers Insurance Co. v. Rose
389 S.W.2d 317 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1965)