Travelers Insurance Company v. Arlie Burleson

Fifth Circuit

Travelers Insurance Company v. Arlie Burleson

238 F.2d 620, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 4075

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedNovember 27, 1956

Docket15993_1

StatusPublished

This text of 238 F.2d 620 (Travelers Insurance Company v. Arlie Burleson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Travelers Insurance Company v. Arlie Burleson, 238 F.2d 620, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 4075 (5th Cir. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appealing from a judgment for the plaintiff under the Texas Workmen’s Compensation Acts, Vernon’s Ann.Civ. St. art. 8306 et seq., the appellant has receded from its position that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict and now urges as error rulings of the court upon the trial which were so patently correct as not to justify discussion. We are not satisfied, however, that the appeal was taken merely for delay. See Rule 30, Fifth Circuit Rules, 28 U.S. C.A. The judgment is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appealing from a judgment for the plaintiff under the Texas Workmen’s Compensation Acts, Vernon’s Ann.Civ. St. art. 8306 et seq., the appellant has receded from its position that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict and now urges as error rulings of the court upon the trial which were so patently correct as not to justify discussion. We are not satisfied, however, that the appeal was taken merely for delay. See Rule 30, Fifth Circuit Rules, 28 U.S. C.A. The judgment is therefore

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 F.2d 620, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 4075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/travelers-insurance-company-v-arlie-burleson-ca5-1956.