Travelers Ins. v. Hurt

167 S.E. 323, 46 Ga. App. 229, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 1
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 7, 1933·No. 21547·Published

Opinion

Stephens, J.

Under the ruling of the Supreme Court in answer to questions certified to it in this case (Travelers Ins. Co. v. Hurt, 176 Ga. 153, 167 S. E. 175), the award of the industrial commission, allowing increased compensation upon an application for compensation upon the ground that the claimant had suffered a change in condition as provided in section 45 of the workmen’s compensation act, was contrary to law; and the judge of the superior court erred in affirming the award.

Judgment reversed.

JenJcins, P. J., and Sutton, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Travelers Ins. v. Hurt, 167 S.E. 323, 46 Ga. App. 229, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 1 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).

167 S.E. 323 (Travelers Ins. v. Hurt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Travelers Insurance v. Hurt
167 S.E. 175 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)