Travelers Indemnity Company v. KUHLMAN CORPORATION
723 N.W.2d 898, 477 Mich. 953
This text of 723 N.W.2d 898 (Travelers Indemnity Company v. KUHLMAN CORPORATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Travelers Indemnity Company v. KUHLMAN CORPORATION, 723 N.W.2d 898, 477 Mich. 953 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
KUHLMAN CORPORATION, Kuhlman Electric Corporation, Borg-Warner, Inc., Trial Court Group, L.L.C., d/b/a The Carlyle Group, a/k/a Carlyle Group, L.P., Defendants-Appellees, and
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, Commerce & Industry Insurance Company, Federal Insurance Company, Interested Parties.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motions for miscellaneous relief are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the May 16, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Stevenson
723 N.W.2d 898 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
723 N.W.2d 898, 477 Mich. 953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/travelers-indemnity-company-v-kuhlman-corporation-mich-2006.