Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Spiro Panagatos

49 A.D.2d 612

Opinion

In a proceeding to stay arbitration, petitioner appeals [613] from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 5, 1975, which denied the application. Order reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements, and proceeding remitted to Special Term for a hearing in accordance herewith. Since the papers raise a question of fact as to whether the alleged "hit-and-run” vehicle was insured, a hearing must be held to determine this issue, which is a condition precedent to arbitration (Matter of Weisburgh v MVAIC, 28 AD2d 783, 784; State-Wide Ins. Co. v Santiago, 70 Misc 2d 400; Matter of Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v Chandras, 67 Misc 2d 723, 724; Matter of Klein [MVAIC], 48 Misc 2d 82, 84). Benjamin, Acting P. J., Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur; Latham and Munder, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm the order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Spiro Panagatos, 49 A.D.2d 612 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

49 A.D.2d 612 (Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Spiro Panagatos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Arbitration between Weisburgh & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
28 A.D.2d 783 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1967)
Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Chandras
67 Misc. 2d 723 (New York Supreme Court, 1971)
State-Wide Insurance v. Santiago
70 Misc. 2d 400 (New York Supreme Court, 1972)