Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Morales
This text of 188 A.D.2d 350 (Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Morales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Irma Vidal Santaella, J.), entered on or about June 24, 1991, which permanently stayed the arbitration of respondent’s claim for uninsured motorist vehicle benefits, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The police accident report of the officer, who witnessed the [351]*351instant car chase and "intentional” ramming of the police vehicle in which Officer Morales was a passenger, was properly admitted into evidence as an exception to the hearsay rule pursuant to CPLR 4518 (a) (see, Yeargans v Yeargans, 24 AD2d 280). Moreover, the officers/witnesses’ statements concerning the intentional nature of the incident were correctly considered by the court since the officers were trained experts in accident investigation. Finally, under the circumstances the court’s conclusion that this was not a covered "accident” was neither against the weight of the evidence nor contrary to law. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 A.D.2d 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/travelers-indemnity-co-v-morales-nyappdiv-1992.