Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Lewis Steel Erection, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Lewis Steel Erection, Inc.

260 So. 2d 528, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6975

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 18, 1972

DocketNo. 71-1253

StatusPublished

This text of 260 So. 2d 528 (Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Lewis Steel Erection, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Lewis Steel Erection, Inc., 260 So. 2d 528, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6975 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal by defendants from an order granting plaintiff a partial summary judgment as to liability and partially as to amount. The order was entered upon plaintiff’s motion to strike for sham the defendant’s answer on the grounds that the defendants had not denied with specificity the plaintiff’s allegations of the complaint. The motion was not sworn to by plaintiff nor was there any affidavit filed with the motion. No motion for summary judgment was filed.

Appellants urge reversal on several grounds. Our review of the record, consideration of the briefs and arguments of counsel convinces us that it was error for the trial court to grant the motion to strike, Carapezza v. Pate, Fla.App.1962, 143 So.2d 346, and to grant the partial summary judgment, Rule 1.510, RCP, 31 F.S.A. and see: Wood v. Kleaveland, Fla.1953, 64 So.2d 684, applying the prior Equity Rule. Therefore we must reverse.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal by defendants from an order granting plaintiff a partial summary judgment as to liability and partially as to amount. The order was entered upon plaintiff’s motion to strike for sham the defendant’s answer on the grounds that the defendants had not denied with specificity the plaintiff’s allegations of the complaint. The motion was not sworn to by plaintiff nor was there any affidavit filed with the motion. No motion for summary judgment was filed.

Appellants urge reversal on several grounds. Our review of the record, consideration of the briefs and arguments of counsel convinces us that it was error for the trial court to grant the motion to strike, Carapezza v. Pate, Fla.App.1962, 143 So.2d 346, and to grant the partial summary judgment, Rule 1.510, RCP, 31 F.S.A. and see: Wood v. Kleaveland, Fla.1953, 64 So.2d 684, applying the prior Equity Rule. Therefore we must reverse.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 So. 2d 528, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/travelers-indemnity-co-v-lewis-steel-erection-inc-fladistctapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack