Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Kammer

Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Kammer

72 A.D.2d 817, 421 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14099
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 26, 1979
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 72 A.D.2d 817 (Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Kammer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Kammer, 72 A.D.2d 817, 421 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14099 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

In a proceeding to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the Travelers Indemnity Company appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered October 4, 1978, which, after a hearing, inter alia, (1) determined that the respondent Commercial Union Assurance Companies had properly canceled its policy of insurance issued to Bruce Shilstone and (2) directed the Travelers Indemnity Company to proceed to arbitration. Judgment reversed, on the law, with costs, and application for stay granted. Section 576 (subd 1, par [c]) of the Banking Law requires that notices of cancellation include certain statements concerning proof of financial security. Those statements are to be printed "in type or print of which its face shall not be smaller than twelve point”. For effective cancellation of an insurance policy strict compliance with this requirement is necessary (Matter of Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. [Stollerman], 70 AD2d 643; Cohn v Royal Globe Ins. Co., 67 AD2d 993). The notice of cancellation here failed to include a financial security statement printed in the statutorily mandated typeface size. Titone, J. P., O’Connor, Gulotta and Hargett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Foster v. Abrams
242 A.D.2d 952 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Belot
123 Misc. 2d 1076 (New York Supreme Court, 1984)
Robles v. Lot Polish Airlines
705 F.2d 85 (Second Circuit, 1983)
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
705 F.2d 85 (Second Circuit, 1983)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Posey
91 A.D.2d 638 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
In re the Arbitration between Amica Mutual Insurance & Jones
85 A.D.2d 727 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
In re the Arbitration between Amica Mutual Insurance & Williams
85 A.D.2d 730 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Gutierrez v. Cervantes
105 Misc. 2d 737 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1980)
In re the Arbitration between Amica Mutual Insurance & Williams
105 Misc. 2d 427 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 A.D.2d 817, 421 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/travelers-indemnity-co-v-kammer-nyappdiv-1979.