Travelers Indemnity Co. of Illinois v. Related Companies, L.P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Travelers Indemnity Co. of Illinois v. Related Companies, L.P.

9 A.D.3d 325, 781 N.Y.S.2d 315, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9918

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 22, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 9 A.D.3d 325 (Travelers Indemnity Co. of Illinois v. Related Companies, L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Travelers Indemnity Co. of Illinois v. Related Companies, L.P., 9 A.D.3d 325, 781 N.Y.S.2d 315, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9918 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered on or about May 7, 2003, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiff insurer’s motion for summary judgment on its fourth cause of action declaring that the subject policy excludes losses for building collapse caused by hidden decay and hidden insect or vermin damage, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The IAS court correctly held that, in the circumstances presented, there is no evidence of a collapse. In any event, the exclusions for the cost of correcting damage caused by insects, deterioration and corrosion, in the section entitled “Uninsured Types of Loss and Costs Excluded,” paragraph (A) (2) (d) and (e), govern the issue of coverage for the claimed loss. Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered on or about May 7, 2003, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiff insurer’s motion for summary judgment on its fourth cause of action declaring that the subject policy excludes losses for building collapse caused by hidden decay and hidden insect or vermin damage, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The IAS court correctly held that, in the circumstances presented, there is no evidence of a collapse. In any event, the exclusions for the cost of correcting damage caused by insects, deterioration and corrosion, in the section entitled “Uninsured Types of Loss and Costs Excluded,” paragraph (A) (2) (d) and (e), govern the issue of coverage for the claimed loss. Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A.D.3d 325, 781 N.Y.S.2d 315, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/travelers-indemnity-co-of-illinois-v-related-companies-lp-nyappdiv-2004.