Travelers Indemnity Co. of Illinois v. Hotelerama Associates, Ltd.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Travelers Indemnity Co. of Illinois v. Hotelerama Associates, Ltd.

732 So. 2d 440, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5662, 1999 WL 270435

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 5, 1999

DocketNo. 98-2876

StatusPublished

This text of 732 So. 2d 440 (Travelers Indemnity Co. of Illinois v. Hotelerama Associates, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Travelers Indemnity Co. of Illinois v. Hotelerama Associates, Ltd., 732 So. 2d 440, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5662, 1999 WL 270435 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no legal or factual basis for the order under review which, in effect, relieved the appellees of the duty to arbitrate the parties’ dispute as they had [441]*441agreed. Roe v. Amica Mut. Ins. Co., 533 So.2d 279 (Fla.1988); Blackhawk Heating & Plumbing Co. v. Data Lease Fin. Corp., 302 So.2d 404 (Fla.1974); Medident Constr., Inc. v. Chappell, 632 So.2d 194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Montesino v. Advent Technologies, Inc., 676 So.2d 32 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), review denied, 684 So.2d 1350 (Fla.1996); Public Health Trust v. M.R. Harrison Constr. Corp., 415 So.2d 756 (Fla 3d DCA 1982), pet. for review denied, 427 So.2d 737 (Fla.1983); Hirschfeld v. Crescent Heights, X, Inc., 707 So.2d 955 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). Hence, the order is reversed with directions to require arbitration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find no legal or factual basis for the order under review which, in effect, relieved the appellees of the duty to arbitrate the parties’ dispute as they had [441]*441agreed. Roe v. Amica Mut. Ins. Co., 533 So.2d 279 (Fla.1988); Blackhawk Heating & Plumbing Co. v. Data Lease Fin. Corp., 302 So.2d 404 (Fla.1974); Medident Constr., Inc. v. Chappell, 632 So.2d 194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Montesino v. Advent Technologies, Inc., 676 So.2d 32 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), review denied, 684 So.2d 1350 (Fla.1996); Public Health Trust v. M.R. Harrison Constr. Corp., 415 So.2d 756 (Fla 3d DCA 1982), pet. for review denied, 427 So.2d 737 (Fla.1983); Hirschfeld v. Crescent Heights, X, Inc., 707 So.2d 955 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). Hence, the order is reversed with directions to require arbitration.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

732 So. 2d 440, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5662, 1999 WL 270435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/travelers-indemnity-co-of-illinois-v-hotelerama-associates-ltd-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack