Travelers Haven LLC v. Avenue5 Residential LLC

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 TRAVELERS HAVEN, LLC, a Florida CASE NO. 3:21-cv-05712-RJB 11 Limited Liability Company, ORDER DENYING THE MOTION 12 Plaintiff, TO STRIKE WITHOUT v. PREJUDICE 13 AVENUE5 RESIDENTIAL, LLC; 14 HIGHLAND CRESTE, LLC; BAY VISTA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC; 15 BUCKLIN HILL RESIDENTIAL, LLC; and COMPASS SIGNATURE 16 APARTMENTS, LLC; 17 Defendants. 18 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Order Striking its Notice of 19 Appeal. Dkt. 31. The Court has reviewed the pleadings filed regarding the motion and the 20 record and is fully advised. 21 On October 13, 2021, Defendant Compass Signature Apartments LLC was dismissed by 22 agreement of the parties. Dkt. 17. On November 12, 2021, Defendants Avenue5 Residential, 23 LLC, Bay Vista Development Company, LLC, and Bucklin Hill Residential, LLC’s Fed. R. Civ. 24 1 P. 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss was granted and the claims asserted against those parties were 2 dismissed. Dkt. 27. On December 13, 2021, the Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal of that 3 November 12, 2021 Order (Dkt. 27). Dkt. 28. The Clerk of the Court for the Ninth Circuit Court 4 of Appeals docketed the appeal on December 14, 2021. Travelers Haven, LLC v. Avenue5 5 Residential, LLC, et. al., Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals case number 21-3607, Dkt. 1.

6 Judgment has not been entered in this case. Bucklin Hill Residential, LLC has asserted 7 counterclaims against the Plaintiff. Further, although Defendant Highland Creste, LLC was 8 served on August 5, 2021 (Dkt. 14-3, at 1), it has not appeared and no motion for default has 9 been filed against it. (The Plaintiff states in the instant motion that it intends to continue the case 10 against Highland Creste, LLC. Dkt. 31.) The Plaintiff and Bucklin Hill Residential, LLC have 11 now filed a Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan. Dkt. 32. 12 On January 10, 2022, the Plaintiff filed its Motion for Order Striking its Notice of 13 Appeal. Dkt. 31. In the motion, the Plaintiff moves for an order striking the notice of appeal 14 (Dkt. 28) without prejudice. Dkt. 31. Defendants Avenue5 Residential, LLC and Bay Vista

15 Development Company, LLC oppose the motion, arguing that this Court does not have 16 jurisdiction to decide the motion. Dkt. 33. 18 Once a notice of appeal is filed from a final judgment, the district court is divested of 19 jurisdiction. Laurino v. Syringa General Hosp., 279 F.3d 750, 755 (9th Cir. 2002); Griggs v. 20 Provident Consumer Disc. Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58- 59 (1982). This general rule does not apply 21 here because no final judgment has been entered. Fed. R. App. P. 42 provides, 22 (a) Dismissal in the District Court. Before an appeal has been docketed by the 23 circuit clerk, the district court may dismiss the appeal on the filing of a stipulation signed by all parties or on the appellant's motion with notice to all parties. 24 1 (b) Dismissal in the Court of Appeals. The circuit clerk may dismiss a docketed 2 appeal if the parties file a signed dismissal agreement specifying how costs are to be paid and pay any fees that are due. But no mandate or other process may issue 3 without a court order. An appeal may be dismissed on the appellant's motion on terms agreed to by the parties or fixed by the court. 4 The Plaintiff’s motion (Dkt. 31) to strike its notice of appeal should be denied without 5 prejudice. The notice of appeal has been docketed by the circuit clerk. This Court does not have 6 jurisdiction to dismiss the appeal. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 The Clerk is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of record and 9 to any party appearing pro se at said party’s last known address. 10 Dated this 31st day of January, 2022. 11 A

12 ROBERT J. BRYAN 13 United States District Judge

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24