Trautwein v. State
366 S.W.3d 88, 2012 WL 1623607, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 625
Opinion
ORDER
John T. Trautwein appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential or precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Trautwein v. State, 366 S.W.3d 88, 2012 WL 1623607, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 625 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
366 S.W.3d 88 (Trautwein v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Ware
366 S.W.3d 88 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)