Traum v. Gundersheimer

New York Supreme Court

Traum v. Gundersheimer

12 N.Y. St. Rep. 879

DecidedDecember 13, 1887

StatusPublished

This text of 12 N.Y. St. Rep. 879 (Traum v. Gundersheimer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Traum v. Gundersheimer, 12 N.Y. St. Rep. 879 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Dykman, J.

This was an action commenced for the recovery of rent for the use and occupation of certain premises in the city of New York.

The cause was tried at the circuit before a jury and a verdict was rendered for the plaintiff, and by special findings the facts were found against the theory of the defendant.

There is no merit in the appeal, and the judgment and order denying the motion for a new trial should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dykman, J.

This was an action commenced for the recovery of rent for the use and occupation of certain premises in the city of New York.

The cause was tried at the circuit before a jury and a verdict was rendered for the plaintiff, and by special findings the facts were found against the theory of the defendant.

There is no merit in the appeal, and the judgment and order denying the motion for a new trial should be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 N.Y. St. Rep. 879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/traum-v-gundersheimer-nysupct-1887.