Traubman v. Sevestre
This text of 133 A. 292 (Traubman v. Sevestre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This suit was brought in the District Court of Elizabeth to recover a month and one-half month’s rent, $81.50, of a [464]*464five-room apartment in No. 328 Morris avenue, Elizabeth, New Jersey. The tenant moved out without giving the three months’ written notice required by the statute. Pamph. L. 1923, p. 144. The case was tried by the court without a jury, resulting in a judgment for the defendant on the ground that the landlord had waived the notice. This was a question of fact. The statute provides that any provision of a lease whereby a lessee or tenant waives any provision of the act shall be deemed against public policy and void. But the landlord is not denied the right to waive such notice. We do not review questions of fact. Paonessa v. Ruh, 78 N. J. L. 253.
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
133 A. 292, 4 N.J. Misc. 463, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/traubman-v-sevestre-nj-1926.