Traub v. Connecticut
This text of 374 U.S. 493 (Traub v. Connecticut) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TRAUB
v.
CONNECTICUT.
Supreme Court of United States.
Petitioner pro se.
John D. LaBelle and Harry W. Hultgren, Jr. for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U. S. 471, and Ker v. California, ante, p. 23.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
374 U.S. 493, 83 S. Ct. 1899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/traub-v-connecticut-scotus-1963.