Traub v. Basketball City N.Y. LLC
This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 32862(U) (Traub v. Basketball City N.Y. LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Traub v Basketball City N.Y. LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 32862(U) August 14, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 151596/2018 Judge: James d'Auguste Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 151596/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 280 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2024
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: Hon. James E. d’Auguste PART 55 Justice ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO. 151596/2018 MARK TRAUB, MOTION DATE 01/11/2022 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 006 -v- BASKETBALL CITY NEW YORK LLC, BASKETBALL CITY U.S.A. LLC, VIACOM INTERNATIONAL INC., VIACOMCBS DECISION + ORDER ON INC., NEW GAMES PRODUCTIONS, INC., MOTION Defendants. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
BASKETBALL CITY NEW YORK LLC, BASKETBALL CITY Third-Party U.S.A. LLC, Index No. 595426/2019
Plaintiffs,
-against-
NEW GAMES PRODUCTION INC.,
Defendant. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
VIACOM INTERNATIONAL INC., VIACOMCBS INC., NEW Second Third-Party GAMES PRODUCTIONS INC., Index No. 595530/2020
PIER PRODUCTIONS & ENTERTAINMENT LLC,
Defendant. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 006) 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 268 were read on this motion to/for SUMMARY JUDGMENT (AFTER JOINDER) .
151596/2018 TRAUB, MARK vs. BASKETBALL CITY NEW YORK LLC Page 1 of 4 Motion No. 006
1 of 4 [* 1] INDEX NO. 151596/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 280 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2024
In Motion Sequence 006, Defendant/Third-Party Defendant/Second Third-Party Plaintiff
New Games Production Inc. (“NGPI”), Defendant/Second Third-Party Plaintiff Viacom
International Inc., and Defendant/Second Third-Party Plaintiff ViacomCBS Inc. (Viacom
International and ViacomCBS collectively as “Viacom”) move for summary judgment, seeking
to dismiss the Labor Law Sections 200, 240(1), and 241 causes of action against them; NGPI
moves for summary judgment, seeking to dismiss Basketball City New York LLC and
Basketball City U.S.A’s (“BBC”) cross-claims for contribution, common-law indemnification,
contractual indemnification, and a cause of action for insurance coverage; and NGPI and Viacom
move for summary judgment against Pier Productions & Entertainment LLC (“PPE”) for
common-law and contractual indemnification. PPE opposes and cross-moves against NGPI and
Viacom to dismiss all claims against PPE. Plaintiffs and BBC also oppose the motion. The
motion is resolved as set forth below.
As an initial matter, the Court granted partial summary judgment to plaintiff as to
plaintiff’s Labor Law Section 240(1) claim in the decision and order on Motion Sequence 002
(dated November 18, 2022, NYSCEF Doc. No. 244). The Court held in abeyance any additional
claims under the Labor Law. Therefore, the branches of NGPI’s and Viacom’s motion seeking
summary judgment against plaintiff are denied.
Viacom/NGPI move to dismiss BBC’s cross-claim for insurance coverage, and PPE
cross-moves to dismiss Viacom/NGPI’s claims for breach of contract for failure to procure
insurance. PPE’s policy with Nationwide demonstrates that Viacom, NGPI, and BBC are listed
as additional insureds under PPE’s insurance policy. NYSCEF Doc. No. 216. This branch of
PPE’s cross-motion is granted. However, Viacom/NGPI have not demonstrated that BBC is
listed as an additional insured under their comprehensive general liability policy, and, instead,
151596/2018 TRAUB, MARK vs. BASKETBALL CITY NEW YORK LLC Page 2 of 4 Motion No. 006
2 of 4 [* 2] INDEX NO. 151596/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 280 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2024
states that BBC has suffered no damages because BBC is listed under PPE’s policy. NYSCEF
Doc. No. 195, at p.17. Therefore, the branch of Viacom/NGPI’s motion seeking to dismiss
BBC’s cross-claim for insurance coverage is denied.
The branch of PPE’s motion seeking to dismiss claims for common-law indemnification
against Viacom and NGPI is granted. PPE argues that they are entitled to summary judgment to
dismiss claims for common-law indemnification because Viacom’s claim is barred the Workers
Compensation Law (“WCL”). WCL Section 11 allows a third-party common-law
indemnification claim to be brought against an employer only “where the injured worker has
suffered a ‘grave injury’ or the employer has entered into a written contract to indemnify the
[party].” Flores v Lower E Side Serv Ctr, 4 NY3d 363, 365 [2005]; NYSCEF Doc. No. 225. The
parties have not presented evidence that plaintiff suffered a grave injury as defined under WCL
Section 11, and, therefore, PPE’s cross-motion for dismissal on the common-law indemnification
claim is granted. However, the Service Agreement between PPE and NGPI constitutes a written
contract with the intent to indemnify, so the branch of the motion seeking to dismiss contractual
indemnification is denied.
All remaining requests for summary judgment are denied. Factual issues remain in this
action, and, therefore, a jury will have to resolve the allocation of liability among the defendants
and related indemnification claims.
Accordingly, it is hereby,
ORDERED that Pier Productions & Entertainment LLC’s cross-motion for summary
judgment to dismiss Viacom’s and NGPI’s cross-claims for insurance coverage is granted, and it
is further,
151596/2018 TRAUB, MARK vs. BASKETBALL CITY NEW YORK LLC Page 3 of 4 Motion No. 006
3 of 4 [* 3] INDEX NO. 151596/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 280 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2024
ORDERED that Pier Productions & Entertainment LLC’s cross-motion for summary
judgment to dismiss Viacom’s and NGPI’s cross-claims for common-law indemnification is
granted, and it is further
ORDERED that all remaining requests for relief are denied.
This constitutes the decision and order of the Court.
8/14/2024 $SIG$ DATE James d’Auguste, J.S.C. CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED X NON-FINAL DISPOSITION
GRANTED DENIED GRANTED IN PART X OTHER
APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER
CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT REFERENCE
151596/2018 TRAUB, MARK vs. BASKETBALL CITY NEW YORK LLC Page 4 of 4 Motion No. 006
4 of 4 [* 4]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2024 NY Slip Op 32862(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/traub-v-basketball-city-ny-llc-nysupctnewyork-2024.