Trataros Construction, Inc. v. Rieck
This text of 270 A.D.2d 104 (Trataros Construction, Inc. v. Rieck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, [105]*105New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered on or about September 23, 1998, which, in a proceeding for the recovery of the allegedly unearned portion of a retainer for legal services, inter alia, referred the issue of the value of respondent’s legal fees to a Special Referee to hear and report with recommendations, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The IAS Court properly submitted the parties’ fee dispute to a Special Referee in light of respondent attorney’s claim that he “fully earned” a $150,000 fee while retained as petitioner’s defense counsel for approximately six weeks during the initial stages of a Federal criminal prosecution (see, Matter of Cox v Scott, 10 AD2d 32, 34; see also, New York State Crime Victims Bd. v Abbott, 212 AD2d 22, 28-29). Respondent’s due process rights will be adequately protected in the instant special proceeding since he will be afforded the opportunity to present testimony and/or affidavits in support of his claim to the entire $150,000 retainer (see, Matter of Greenwald v Scheinman, 94 AD2d 842, 843, lv denied 60 NY2d 551). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Tom, Lerner and Rubin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
270 A.D.2d 104, 704 N.Y.S.2d 470, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trataros-construction-inc-v-rieck-nyappdiv-2000.