Trasti v. State

470 So. 2d 849, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1460, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14536
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 13, 1985
DocketNo. 84-1582
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 470 So. 2d 849 (Trasti v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trasti v. State, 470 So. 2d 849, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1460, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14536 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The offense in this case was committed before the effective date of the sentencing guidelines and the record does not show that the appellant affirmatively elected to be sentenced pursuant to the sentencing guidelines (§ 921.001, Fla.Stat. (1983); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701) anytime prior to, or during, sentencing proceeding. Therefore, the guideline sentence in this case is vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing.

SENTENCE VACATED; CAUSE REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, ORFINGER and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Trasti v. State
487 So. 2d 428 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
470 So. 2d 849, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1460, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trasti-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.