Trask v. Wingate

3 A. 926, 63 N.H. 474
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedDecember 5, 1885
StatusPublished

This text of 3 A. 926 (Trask v. Wingate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trask v. Wingate, 3 A. 926, 63 N.H. 474 (N.H. 1885).

Opinion

*475 Bingham, J.

The note was made by the defendant for the accommodation and general benefit of Lovering, who, having five hundred dollars of the plaintiff’s money for investment, indorsed the note, gave it to the plaintiff for the money, and then used it as he pleased. This was within the purpose for which the defendant executed the note.

Lovering could have transferred the note to the plaintiff in payment of an antecedent debt, and the debt would have been a sufficient consideration for the transfer. Perry v. Armstrong, 89 N. H. 583; Schepp v. Carpenter, 51 N. Y. 602; Bank v. Buck, 5 Wend. 66.

The plaintiff can maintain this action. Bank v. Band, 38 N. H. 166; Cross v. Rowe, 22 N. H. 77.

Exception overruled.’

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schepp v. . Carpenter
51 N.Y. 602 (New York Court of Appeals, 1873)
Bank of Rutland v. Buck
5 Wend. 66 (New York Supreme Court, 1830)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 A. 926, 63 N.H. 474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trask-v-wingate-nh-1885.