Trascher v. Johnson

163 So. 431
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedOctober 7, 1935
DocketNo. 16232.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 163 So. 431 (Trascher v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trascher v. Johnson, 163 So. 431 (La. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The basis of the motion to dismiss' is the alleged want of jurisdiction ratione materias in this court to hear and determine this appeal because of the alleged fact that the amount in controversy is in excess of $2,000, the maximum jurisdiction of this court in moneyed demands.

The record indicates that this appeal was taken by plaintiff from a judgment dismissing his suit for damages for slander. It is true that in, the prayer of the petition the plaintiff fixes his damages in the sum of $25,000, but since under the jurisprudence of this state no award of damages, upon a similar cause of action, has ever been approved in excess of the sum of $2,000, the maximum limit of our jurisdiction, we are of the opinion that the demand of the plaintiff in this case is inflated, and that the real amount in controversy is well within our jurisdiction. See Lebert v. Daily States Pub. Co. et al., 123 La. 594, 49 So. 206, 23 L. R. A. (N. S.) 726, 131 Am. St. Rep. 356; Bache v. Stoltz, 16 La. App. 524, 134 So. 112.

The motion to dismiss will be denied.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schrader v. Coleman E. Adler & Sons, Inc.
65 So. 2d 136 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1953)
Moore v. O'Hara
8 So. 2d 130 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1942)
Jumonville v. Frey's, Inc.
171 So. 590 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1937)
Nagle v. Shreveport Journal Pub. Co.
170 So. 270 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 So. 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trascher-v-johnson-lactapp-1935.