Trappan v. Morie
18 Johns. 1
Opinion
The landlord had a lien on the, goods for the quarter’s rent due on the 1st of May, 1819, previous to the levy of the execution. But he is not entitled to demand of the sheriff the rent which subsequently accrued, while the goods remained on the premises, in the sheriff’s possession. The rule, therefore, must be for the sheriff to pay to Parcells, the landlord, the rent due on the 1st of May, 1819.
Rule accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Trappan v. Morie, 18 Johns. 1 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1820).
18 Johns. 1 (Trappan v. Morie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harris Bros. v. Dammann
14 D.C. 90 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1884)
Bryan v. Sanderson
10 D.C. 431 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1881)
Washington v. Williamson
23 Md. 244 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1865)
Denham v. Harris
13 Ala. 465 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1848)
Russell v. Doty
4 Cow. 576 (New York Supreme Court, 1825)