Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Trapp v. State

Trapp v. State

111 So. 3d 185, 2013 WL 238174, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 933
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 23, 2013
DocketNo. 4D12-1190
StatusPublished

This text of 111 So. 3d 185 (Trapp v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trapp v. State, 111 So. 3d 185, 2013 WL 238174, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 933 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to correct an illegal sentence, claiming additional jail credit. The record before the trial court does not show entitlement to relief. See Gethers v. State, 798 So.2d 829, 832-33 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), decision approved, 838 So.2d 504, 508 (Fla.2003). Our affirmance is without prejudice to the defendant filing a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850, or a facially sufficient rule 3.800 motion in which he can show that his detention in the Miami-Dade County Jail was due solely to the charges in this case.

Affirmed.

WARNER, POLEN and LEVINE, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gethers v. State
838 So. 2d 504 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)
Gethers v. State
798 So. 2d 829 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 So. 3d 185, 2013 WL 238174, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trapp-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.