Trapkin v. State

857 So. 2d 989, 2003 WL 22447521
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 29, 2003
DocketNo. 4D03-2562
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 857 So. 2d 989 (Trapkin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trapkin v. State, 857 So. 2d 989, 2003 WL 22447521 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of his Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion for jail credit. This is appellant’s renewed motion which followed this court’s affirmance without prejudice. See Trapkin v. State, 830 So.2d 172 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

We find appellant’s renewed motion to be legally sufficient, and reverse and remand to the trial court for a determination on the merits. If the record conclusively refutes the claim, then the trial court should attach those portions of the record supporting denial. See Collins v. State, 805 So.2d 73, 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). If the record available to the trial court, which includes the jail records referenced, establishes that appellant is entitled to the credit he requests, the court shall award him the jail credit. See Phillips v. State, 839 So.2d 893, 894 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

WARNER, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schuettler v. State
931 So. 2d 1044 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Thomas v. the Chase Manhattan Bank
857 So. 2d 989 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
857 So. 2d 989, 2003 WL 22447521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trapkin-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.