Transportes Aereos Benianos, S. A. v. Tilton

229 So. 2d 319
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 23, 1969
DocketNo. 69-358
StatusPublished

This text of 229 So. 2d 319 (Transportes Aereos Benianos, S. A. v. Tilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Transportes Aereos Benianos, S. A. v. Tilton, 229 So. 2d 319 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Transportes Aereos, Beni-anos, S. A., was the plaintiff in the trial court. Its complaint sought to enforce a statutory lien. After a non-jury trial the court found:

* * * * * *
“1. That plaintiff has failed to prove its case by a preponderance of evidence.
2. That plaintiff’s complaint does not lie in the kind of action instituted”

and entered judgment for the defendant.

Appellant’s first point is essentially an attack on the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment. No error has been demonstrated under this point. See, e. g., Boulevard Nat. Bank of Miami v. Gulf Am. Land Corp., Fla.App.1968, 212 So.2d 17, 20.

Appellant’s second point is a contention that the court should have granted part of its claim because the appellee admitted partial liability. This contention is not supported by the record.

The appellant has not shown reversible error. We therefore affirm the judgment appealed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boulevard Nat. Bank of Miami v. Gulf Am. Land Corp.
212 So. 2d 17 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
229 So. 2d 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/transportes-aereos-benianos-s-a-v-tilton-fladistctapp-1969.