Transportation Services v. Seaboard Marine
This text of 245 So. 3d 1006 (Transportation Services v. Seaboard Marine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed May 30, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D17-1682 Lower Tribunal No. 16-3975 ________________
Transportation Services, Inc. and Carrier Equipment, Inc., Appellants,
vs.
Seaboard Marine LTD., Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Antonio Marin, Judge.
Aponte Law and Darren R. Aponte, for appellants.
Blanck & Cooper and Jonathan S. Cooper, for appellee.
Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SALTER and SCALES, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Defendants/counter-plaintiffs/appellants, Transportation Services, Inc., and
Carrier Equipment, Inc., have appealed an order in favor of plaintiff/counter- defendant/appellee, Seaboard Marine Ltd., captioned “Final Judgment for
Counterdefendant Seaboard Marine.” That order granted Seaboard Marine’s
motion for summary judgment on the appellants’ counterclaims, dismissing those
counterclaims, and concluding that the appellants “shall take nothing by this suit
and [the appellee] shall go hence without day.” The order did not address or
dispose of the appellee’s still-pending claims as plaintiff against the appellants;
those claims and the appellants’ counterclaims arose from the same transactions
and occurrences.
We issued an order to the parties to show cause why the order on appeal
should not be reversed to exclude the purported words of finality, “go hence
without day,” without prejudice to the rights of the parties to appeal when both the
claims and counterclaims have been fully adjudicated, citing Haven Center, Inc. v.
Meruelo, 22 So. 3d 849, 850 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). No responses were filed.
We reverse the order sought to be appealed, and remand the case for the
deletion from the order of the phrase “go hence without day.” The reversal does
not disturb the trial court’s decision to grant the appellee’s motion for summary
judgment on the counterclaim, and is without prejudice to the rights of the parties
to appeal when the claims and counterclaims have been fully adjudicated.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
245 So. 3d 1006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/transportation-services-v-seaboard-marine-fladistctapp-2018.