Transportation Insurance v. Phillips

222 A.D.2d 683, 636 N.Y.S.2d 85, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13886
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 29, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In a proceeding to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, Michael E. Phillips appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Barone, J.), dated October 29, 1993, which, without a hearing, granted the petition and denied his cross motion to add Transcontinental Insurance Company and Allstate Insurance as additional respondents and to set the matter down for a framed-issue hearing.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, Michael E. Phillips’ cross motion is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Orange County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

A party seeking to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim bears the initial burden of proving that the alleged offending vehicle was insured (see, Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Fenelon, 202 AD2d 436). Since a threshold question of fact exists as to whether the offending vehicle was unidentified, and thus, whether the offending vehicle was [684] insured, the court should have directed a hearing on this issue and permitted joinder of the two insurance carriers of the alleged offending vehicles (see, Matter of Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v Arhaniotis, 202 AD2d 497). Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Transportation Insurance v. Phillips, 222 A.D.2d 683, 636 N.Y.S.2d 85, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

222 A.D.2d 683 (Transportation Insurance v. Phillips) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bono v. City of New York
2 Misc. 3d 59 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)